An Empirical Investigation of Different Classifiers, Encoding, and Ensemble Schemes for Next Event Prediction Using Business Process Event Logs
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Bayu Adhi Tama | - |
dc.contributor.author | Comuzzi, M. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Ko, J. | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-01-21T02:30:04Z | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-01-21T02:30:04Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-01-21T02:30:04Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-01-21T02:30:04Z | - |
dc.date.created | 2020-12-03 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2020-11 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 2157-6904 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://pr.ibs.re.kr/handle/8788114/9081 | - |
dc.description.abstract | There is a growing need for empirical benchmarks that support researchers and practitioners in selecting the best machine learning technique for given prediction tasks. In this article, we consider the next event prediction task in business process predictive monitoring, and we extend our previously published benchmark by studying the impact on the performance of different encoding windows and of using ensemble schemes. The choice of whether to use ensembles and which scheme to use often depends on the type of data and classification task. While there is a general understanding that ensembles perform well in predictive monitoring of business processes, next event prediction is a task for which no other benchmarks involving ensembles are available. The proposed benchmark helps researchers to select a high-performing individual classifier or ensemble scheme given the variability at the case level of the event log under consideration. Experimental results show that choosing an optimal number of events for feature encoding is challenging, resulting in the need to consider each event log individually when selecting an optimal value. Ensemble schemes improve the performance of low-performing classifiers in this task, such as SVM, whereas high-performing classifiers, such as tree-based classifiers, are not better off when ensemble schemes are considered | - |
dc.language | 영어 | - |
dc.publisher | Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) | - |
dc.title | An Empirical Investigation of Different Classifiers, Encoding, and Ensemble Schemes for Next Event Prediction Using Business Process Event Logs | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.type.rims | ART | - |
dc.identifier.wosid | 000589194300005 | - |
dc.identifier.scopusid | 2-s2.0-85095864630 | - |
dc.identifier.rimsid | 73838 | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | Bayu Adhi Tama | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1145/3406541 | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology, v.11, no.6, pp.1 - 34 | - |
dc.relation.isPartOf | ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology | - |
dc.citation.title | ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology | - |
dc.citation.volume | 11 | - |
dc.citation.number | 6 | - |
dc.citation.startPage | 1 | - |
dc.citation.endPage | 34 | - |
dc.description.journalClass | 1 | - |
dc.description.journalClass | 1 | - |
dc.description.isOpenAccess | N | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scie | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scopus | - |
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory | Computer Science, Artificial Intelligence | - |
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory | Computer Science, Information Systems | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | business process | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Classifier ensembles | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | empirical benchmark | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | homogeneous ensembles | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | individual classifier | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | next event prediction | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | predictive monitoring | - |